Izquierdo-Bernabe

Izquierdo-Bernabe v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202523-1372California1,211 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL IZQUIERDO-BERNABE, No. 23-1372 Agency No. Petitioner, A216-474-826 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 20, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Manuel Izquierdo-Bernabe petitions for review of the decision of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the denial of his application for

cancellation of removal. He argues that the Immigration Judge (“IJ”) erred in

assessing the hardship that his removal would bring upon his qualifying relatives—

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Petitioner’s motion to appear remotely for oral argument, Dkt. No. 39, is denied as moot. his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.