Harrison

Harrison v. Vale Oregon Irrigation District

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202524-2764California1,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHAD HARRISON, in his capacity as No. 24-2764 Personal Representative of The Estate of D.C. No. Johnathon Harrison, 2:23-cv-00334-HL Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

VALE OREGON IRRIGATION

DISTRICT, a local government entity; TY

KING; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF

RECLAMATION, a federal government entity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Andrew D. Hallman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: McKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for This wrongful death action arises from a motor vehicle accident…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.