Contreras-Porcayo

Contreras-Porcayo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202524-7609California1,298 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 8 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTIAN DAVID No. 24-7609 CONTRERAS-PORCAYO, Agency No.

A087-777-352

Petitioner,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

Appeal from the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 3, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: MCKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges and FITZWATER,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Christian David Contreras-Porcayo (“Contreras-Porcayo”) petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) order affirming the immigration

judge’s (“IJ’s”) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.