Ahir

Ahir v. City of Anaheim

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 8, 202524-4485California731 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PRAVIN AHIR; NEOMI HOSPITALITY, No. 24-4485 INC., D.C. No. 8:22-cv-01581-JVS-ADS Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs Pravin Ahir and Neomi Hospitality, Inc. appeal the district court’s

grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant City of Anaheim on Plaintiffs’

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). procedural due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and petition for a writ of

mandate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.