Ahir
Ahir v. City of Anaheim
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 8 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PRAVIN AHIR; NEOMI HOSPITALITY, No. 24-4485 INC., D.C. No. 8:22-cv-01581-JVS-ADS Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF ANAHEIM, a municipal corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 3, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs Pravin Ahir and Neomi Hospitality, Inc. appeal the district court’s
grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant City of Anaheim on Plaintiffs’
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). procedural due process claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and petition for a writ of
mandate…