Guillen

Gishela Guillen and Teresa Sandberg v. El Dorado County; Lynda Jorgenson; Melanie Shasta; Kevin Bailey; and Does 1 to 50, inclusive

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20252:25-cv-02588California2,445 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GISHELA GUILLEN and TERESA

SANDBERG,

No. 2:25-CV-02588-TLN-CKD Plaintiffs,

ORDER v.

EL DORADO COUNTY; LYNDA

JORGENSON; MELANIE SHASTA; KEVIN BAILEY; and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants.

19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Gishela Guillen and Teresa Sandberg’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. (ECF No. 19.) Defendants El Dorado County (“County”), Lynda Jorgenson, Melanie Shasta, and Kevin Bailey (“Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 20.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 21.) For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED. /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed the instant Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order on October 3, 2025, seeking the following relief: 1. Enjoining Defendants from expiring the current business license set to expire…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.