Hartley

Roger Andrew Hartley v. D. Bright, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20255:23-cv-00767California2,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROGER ANDREW HARTLEY, Case No. 23-cv-00767-PCP

Plaintiff, ORDER OF SERVICE IN PART;

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO BE

v. APPOINTED PRO BONO COUNSEL

AND TO PROCEED IN FORMA

D. BRIGHT, et al., PAUPERIS ON APPEAL Defendants. Dkt. Nos. 27,

12 Roger Hartley, an inmate at the California Institute for Men in Chino, California, filed this pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 regarding events that occurred at Salinas Valley State Prison (“SVSP”). The Court concluded that Mr. Hartley’s original complaint failed to state any claim and dismissed with leave to amend as to some defendants. Dkt. No. 15. Mr. Hartley filed a first amended complaint that suggested that his claims were time-barred, and the Court accordingly dismissed the action entirely. Dkt. No. 19. Mr. Hartley moved to re-open the case, explaining that his claims arose more recently than his first amended complaint had stated. Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.