Cuper Development, LLC v. City of Cudahy

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202524-5898California1,299 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CUPER DEVELOPMENT, LLC; GO No. 24-5898 CUDAHY, LLC; DAVINA, LLC; GENIUS D.C. No. DISTRIBUTION, LLC; HERBAL 2:24-cv-02833-DSF-SK

DRAGON LLC; DANIEL AND

GOLIATH, LLC,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CITY OF CUDAHY, a municipal corporation; ALFONSO

NOYOLA; ELIZABETH

ALCANTAR; MARTIN

FUENTES; CYNTHIA

GONZALEZ; DAISY LOMELI; JOSHUA

CALHOUN; RAUL DIAZ; CECILIA

MADRIGAL-GONZALEZ; LOUIS

MORALES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 5, 2025**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Pasadena, California

Before: BEA, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiffs-Appellants are six limited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.