Bright

Bright v. State of Oregon

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202524-5463California743 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VICTORIA BRIGHT, an individual, No. 24-5463 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-00320-MO v.

MEMORANDUM*

STATE OF OREGON; OREGON

DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE

SERVICES; BERRI LESLIE, in her official capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of Administrative Services,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Victoria Bright (“Bright”) brings First and Fourteenth Amendment claims

based on a payroll processing error that caused the Oregon Department of

Administrative Services (“DAS”) to deduct union dues from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.