Barbey

Barbey v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202524-5424California973 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN BARBEY, an No. 24-5424 individual; ARIEL BARBEY, an individual, D.C. No. 2:23-cv-08924-MWF-SSC Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

DOES,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jonathan and Ariel Barbey (“the Barbeys”) appeal the district court’s grant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. of summary judgement in favor of State Farm. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgement de novo. Lowry v.

City of San Diego, 858 F.3d 1248, 1254 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.