Bondi

Arteaga Verastegui v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202525-1200California827 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTHA ARTEAGA VERASTEGUI, No. 25-1200 Agency No. Petitioner, A220-472-033 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Martha Arteaga Verastegui (“Arteaga Verastegui”), a native and citizen of

Peru, petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) denying Arteaga Verastegui’s November 5, 2024 motion to reconsider

(“Motion to Reconsider”) the BIA’s decision denying Arteaga Verastegui’s April

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 8, 2024 motion to reissue (“Motion to Reissue”).1 We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C § 1252. “We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.