Zelaya-Romero

Zelaya-Romero v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202523-3915California489 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARIXI MARBELY ZELAYA-ROMERO; No. 23-3915

RUTH IVETH CARRILLO-ZELAYA,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A215-937-180,

A215-937-181

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,*** District Judge.

Arixi Marbely Zelaya-Romero and her minor daughter (“Petitioners”), natives

and citizens of Honduras, petition for review of a decision of a Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.