Lonich

United States v. Lonich

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202524-1678California1,155 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 24-1673, 24-1678

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:14-cr-00139-SI-2, 3:17- cr-00139-SI-3 v.

DAVID LONICH, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Hon. Susan Illston, Presiding

Submitted December 5, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,*** District Judge.

This appeal arises from fraudulent schemes involving bank loans and real-

estate developments in Sonoma County, California. Previously, this court affirmed

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.