Bondi

Tzun Cotom v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202522-1420California744 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE MIGUEL TZUN COTOM, No. 22-1420

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-467-369

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL,*** District Judge.

Jose Miguel Tzun Cotom, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of a July 25, 2022, Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Lee H. Rosenthal, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of Texas, sitting by designation. his appeal of an immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for withholding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.