Bondi
Porras Atao v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202524-926California1,426 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALICIA GERTRUDES PORRAS ATAO, No. 24-926 aka ALICIA GERTRUDES PORRAS- Agency Nos. ATAO; FRANK MAYTA PORRAS, aka A240-049-758
FRANK MAYTA-PORRAS, A240-049-759
Petitioners,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 18, 2025** Seattle, Washington
Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
Alicia Gertrudes Porras Atao (Porras Atao) and her minor son, both citizens
of Peru, petition for review of the denial of their applications for asylum and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).