Bondi

Porras Atao v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202524-926California1,426 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALICIA GERTRUDES PORRAS ATAO, No. 24-926 aka ALICIA GERTRUDES PORRAS- Agency Nos. ATAO; FRANK MAYTA PORRAS, aka A240-049-758

FRANK MAYTA-PORRAS, A240-049-759

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 18, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, PAEZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Alicia Gertrudes Porras Atao (Porras Atao) and her minor son, both citizens

of Peru, petition for review of the denial of their applications for asylum and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT).

We have jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.