Bondi

Jaramillo Regalado v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202523-2575California1,546 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALDO ALBERTO JARAMILLO No. 23-2575 REGALADO, Agency No.

A215-856-020

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, BEA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Aldo Alberto Jaramillo Regalado (“Jaramillo Regalado”) is a

native and citizen of Mexico who seeks review of a decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying his motion to reopen his immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). proceedings based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.