Duran-Serrano

Duran-Serrano v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 202521-990California1,087 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERASMO DURAN-SERRANO, No. 21-990 Agency No. Petitioner, A213-079-190 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 20, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, LEE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Erasmo Duran-Serrano, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of his appeal of an immigration

judge’s (IJ) decision denying his claims for cancellation of removal, asylum,

withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (CAT) protection. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review the IJ and BIA’s factual findings and “primarily factual mixed question[s]”

“for substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.