In re J.H. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 9, 2025E085283California348 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

When the minor was 15 years old, he restrained Jane Doe, a high school student,

in the women’s bathroom of a fast food restaurant, kissed her, and forced her to touch his

penis. The minor was taken into custody and the People filed a section 602 petition

alleging the minor falsely imprisoned and sexually battered Doe in violation of Penal

Code sections 236 and 243.4, subdivision (a), respectively.

After hearing testimony of the victim, the minor, and witnesses, the juvenile court

found the allegations against the minor true beyond a reasonable doubt and sustained the

petition. It adjudged the minor a ward of the court, placed him on probation, and ordered

him to pay $100 restitution (with the court reserving jurisdiction over that issue). The

minor appealed and we appointed counsel to represent him.

DISCUSSION

On appeal, the minor’s appointed appellate counsel filed an opening brief that sets

forth statements of the case and facts but does not present any issues for adjudication.

The brief includes a request for independent review of the record by this court in

keeping with the procedures set forth in People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and

1 All…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.