Christy Palmer, Vartan Piroumian, Edward Cox, and Jean-Claude Franchitti v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20252:17-cv-06848California4,521 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTY PALMER, VARTAN ) Case No. CV 17-6848-DMG (Ex) ) PIROUMIAN, EDWARD COX, and ) JEAN-CLAUDE FRANCHITTI, ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND Plaintiffs, ) ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE v. ) PLAINTIFFS’ DISPARATE IMPACT COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY ) CLAIM ) SOLUTIONS CORPORATION and )

COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY )

)

SOLUTIONS U.S. CORPORATION, )

Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This matter is before the Court following an October 4, 2024 jury verdict in favor of Plaintiffs Vartan Piroumian and Brian Cox, and against Defendants Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation (collectively, “Cognizant”) on Plaintiffs’ claim that Cognizant engaged in a pattern or practice of intentional discrimination against non-South Asian and non-Indian employees. [Doc. # 666…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.