Kittson

United States v. Kittson

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202523-4132California712 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-4132 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:21-cr-00075-IM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

DANIEL MATTHEW KITTSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 12, 2025 Portland, Oregon

Before: SCHROEDER, OWENS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Daniel Matthew Kittson appeals from his conviction for possessing or

transferring a machinegun in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). He raises jury

instruction and sentencing challenges.1 As the parties are familiar with the facts,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 1 Kittson also challenges his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(o), arguing that (1) § 922(o)(2)(A) exempts his transfer of a machinegun to an undercover agent and (2) § 922(o) is unconstitutional. We address these arguments in a concurrently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.