Bisignano

Clark v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202524-6637California1,164 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 10 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STACEY J. CLARK, No. 24-6637

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:24-cv-05040-SKV v. Western District of Washington, Tacoma FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington

Submitted December 5, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: McKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges and FITZWATER, District Judge.***

Stacey J. Clark (“Clark”) appeals the denial of her application for supplemental

security income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1381

et seq. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.