Reyes-Noriega

Reyes-Noriega v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202525-1637California586 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NELSON RAUL REYES-NORIEGA; No. 25-1637 KAREN DENISE LOPEZ-VELASQUEZ Agency Nos.

DE REYES; N. R.-L., A220-310-357

A220-310-356

Petitioners,

A220-310-368

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 5, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: BEA, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Nelson Raul Reyes-Noriega (“Reyes-Noriega”), his wife, Karen

Denise Lopez-Velasquez de Reyes (“Karen”), and their minor child are natives and

citizens of Guatemala who seek review of a decision of the Board of Immigration

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appeals (“BIA”) which denied their motion to reconsider.1 We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.