Bondi

Mateo Mateo v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 10, 202524-7789California1,003 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSA MARIA MATEO MATEO; LAURA No. 24-7789 FLORES FRANCISCO MATEO; MATEO Agency Nos.

GONZALEZ FRANCISCO MATEO, A208-306-512

A208-306-513

Petitioners,

A208-306-514

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Rosa Maria Mateo Mateo (“Mateo”) and her two minor children (together

“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of a decision

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying asylum, withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.