Rialto Terrance Homeowners Assn. v. Superior Court CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 2025E086082California2,693 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

On December 9, 2022, real party in interest K.H., a 12-year-old boy, was bitten on

the legs and genitals by a pit bull while in the garage of an apartment complex, causing

severe injuries. Petitioners are Legend Apex Investments LLC (Legend), which owned

the apartment complex; DFT, Inc. dba Cannon Management (Cannon), which managed

it; and Rialto Terrace Homeowners Association (Rialto), a homeowners’ association

formed when the property was originally developed as condominiums to be sold, though

it ended up as a residential rental property. A tenant in the complex, Trisha Scott, owned

the dog.

2 Scott’s lease prohibited her from having a dog in the apartment without prior

written authorization, and disallowed pit bulls (and certain other “dangerous” breeds)

altogether, with an exception for service or companion animals.

K.H., acting through his guardian ad litem, sued petitioners and Scott. He asserted 1 claims for premises liability and negligence against petitioners.

Petitioners moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, summary

adjudication. The motion argued petitioners had no actual notice that the dog was

dangerous.

The trial court denied the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.