L.

T.L. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20253:24-cv-09217California729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Case No. 23-md-03084-CRB (LJC)

PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT

LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE MOTION TO COMPEL This Document Relates To: COMPLIANCE BY THE COMFY PLACE T.L. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 24-cv-09217-CRB Re: Dkt. No. 4292

12 Plaintiff T.L. moves to compel compliance with a subpoena served on The Comfy Place, a provider of mental health services in Georgia, seeking Plaintiff’s treatment records. Dkt. No. 4292. The subpoena demanded compliance at Plaintiff’s counsel’s office in Denver, Colorado. ECF No. 4292-1. In the hope that Plaintiff and The Comfy Place could work out any dispute among themselves, the Court directed them to meet and confer and file a joint letter no later than November 17, 2025 if The Comfy Place opposed Plaintiff’s Motion. Dkt. No. 4304. That Order stated that “[i]f no joint letter is filed, the Court will resolve the matter on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.