Sunderland

Linda Sunderland, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, et al. v. Pharmacare U.S., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 7, 20253:23-cv-01318California1,562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 LINDA SUNDERLAND, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01318-JES-AHG individually and on behalf of all others ORDER RESOLVING OPPOSED similarly situated, et al.,

JOINT MOTION, AND GRANTING

14 Plaintiffs, IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v.

CONTINUANCE

PHARMACARE U.S., INC.,

[ECF No. 121] Defendant. 18 19 20 Before the Court is the parties’ opposed joint motion regarding Plaintiff’s request for a continuance. ECF No. 112. Plaintiff seeks an order extending certain deadlines regarding class notice, which Defendant opposes in part. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order, or other deadlines set forth by the Court, must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); FED. R. CIV. P. 6(b) (“When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.