Eunji Jeong v. John or Jane Doe, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20258:25-cv-02024California843 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. 8:25-cv-02024-KES Date: December 4, 2025

Title: EUNJI JEONG v. JOHN or JANE DOE, et al.

PRESENT:

THE HONORABLE KAREN E. SCOTT, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Jazmin Dorado Not Present Courtroom Court Reporter Clerk

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR

PLAINTIFF: DEFENDANTS:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): Order to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and/or Failure to Follow Court Orders

This Court orders Plaintiff Eunji Jeong (“Plaintiff”) to show cause why Case No. 8:25-cv-02024-KES should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to follow court orders pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 41(b).

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On September 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Complaint alleging that the unknown defendant or defendants (“Doe”) stalked Plaintiff in violation of federal and state statutes, recorded confidential communications in violation of the California Privacy Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.