Jung Wook Na v. Jasmine Pearl Na

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 20258:25-cv-02479California2,256 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION 9

Case No. 8:25-cv-02479-DOC-ADS

JUNG WOOK NA,

Petitioner,

13 v.

JASMINE PEARL NA, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

15 Respondent. MOTION TO REMAND [9] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Petitioner Jung Wook Na’s (“Petitioner”) Motion to Remand Case to Orange County Superior Court (“Mot.”) (Dkt. 9). The Court heard oral arguments on December 8, 2025. For reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Petitioner’s Motion to Remand and sets an Evidentiary Hearing on January 12, 2025 and a case management conference on December 8, 2025. 7 I. BACKGROUND A. Facts The following facts are from Petition Under the Hague Convention. (“Petition”) (Dkt. 1); Ex. 3 (Dkt. 9). Jasmine Pearl Na (“Respondent”) and Petitioner met in Irvine, California in 1997 and became close friends, even after Petitioner moved back to South Korea.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.