Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202525-2935California14,771 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EPIC GAMES, INC., No. 25-2935 D.C. No. Plaintiff-ctr-defendant - 4:20-cv-05640- Appellee,

YGR

v.

APPLE INC.,

OPINION

Defendant-ctr-claimant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 21, 2025 San Francisco, California

Filed December 11, 2025

Before: SIDNEY R. THOMAS and MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judges, and MICHAEL J. MCSHANE, Chief District Judge. *

Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.

* The Honorable Michael J. McShane, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation. EPIC GAMES, INC. V. APPLE INC.

SUMMARY **

Contempt / Sanctions

The panel (1) affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s order imposing civil contempt sanctions on Apple Inc. for failing to comply with an injunction in an action brought by Epic Games, Inc.; and (2) declined to vacate the injunction. After a bench trial, the district court enjoined Apple from certain anticompetitive business…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.