Rosas

Rosas v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202524-5406California961 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUCIO ROSAS, No. 24-5406 Agency No. Petitioner, A096-322-873 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Homeland Security

Submitted December 1, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, OWENS, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Lucio Rosas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) negative reasonable fear determination following the

Department of Homeland Security’s reinstatement of his prior removal order. In

his petition, Rosas also argues that his reasonable fear of persecution interview

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with a United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) officer

violated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.