Wang

Wang v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202525-884California1,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ENYI WANG, No. 25-884 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-181-587 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 8, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Enyi Wang, a Chinese citizen, petitions for review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The “substantial evidence”

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). standard governs our review of the BIA’s decision. Garcia-Milian v. Holder,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.