Wang
Wang v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202525-884California1,366 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 11 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ENYI WANG, No. 25-884 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-181-587 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 8, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Enyi Wang, a Chinese citizen, petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing his appeal of an Immigration
Judge’s (IJ) denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and
protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The “substantial evidence”
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). standard governs our review of the BIA’s decision. Garcia-Milian v. Holder,…