Hendrix
United States v. Hendrix
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
DEC 11 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 25-323
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00024-JLR-1 v.
JAMES JOSEPH HENDRIX, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 4, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: *** McKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge. Defendant-Appellant James Joseph Hendrix (“Hendrix”) appeals the revocation
of his supervised release, contending that the district court violated his due process
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. right to confrontation by…