Hendrix

United States v. Hendrix

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202525-323California1,089 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

DEC 11 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 25-323

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00024-JLR-1 v.

JAMES JOSEPH HENDRIX, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: *** McKEOWN and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and FITZWATER,*** District Judge. Defendant-Appellant James Joseph Hendrix (“Hendrix”) appeals the revocation

of his supervised release, contending that the district court violated his due process

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Sidney A. Fitzwater, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation. right to confrontation by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.