Ruiz-Hernandez

Ruiz-Hernandez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 202525-220California671 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 11 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE RUIZ-HERNANDEZ, No. 25-220 Agency No. Petitioner, A087-746-108 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jose Ruiz-Hernandez (Ruiz) seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ)

decision denying protection from removal under the Convention Against Torture

(CAT). Ruiz also seeks review of the BIA’s refusal—for timeliness reasons—to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). terminate proceedings due to alleged deficiencies in his Notice to Appear (NTA).

We deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.