Gray
Stephen Gray, et al. v. Warren Verbanec, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 STEPHEN GRAY, et al., Case No. 25-cv-07307-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS
WARREN VERBANEC, et al., [Re: ECF No. 6] Defendants.
12 Before the Court is Defendant Warren Verbanec’s motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiffs Stephen and Mikyong “Gina” Grays’ complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ECF No. 6 (“Mot.”). Plaintiffs filed a brief in opposition. ECF No. 13 (“Opp.”). The Court finds that the motion is suitable for adjudication without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for January 15, 2026. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons that follow, the motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This case arises out of an alleged conspiracy to deprive Ms. Gray “of her civil rights and her right to live free of harassment based on race, color, sex, national origin[,] and age.” ECF No. 1…