Bondi

Oliva Molina v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202523-1973California849 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YESENIA OLIVA MOLINA; ULISES No. 23-1973 GONZALEZ ACEVEDO; ULISES Agency Nos.

GONZALEZ OLIVA, A208-602-607

A208-924-684

Petitioners,

A207-010-831

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted November 3, 2025 Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Ulises Gonzalez Oliva and his parents, Yesenia Oliva Molina and Ulises

Gonzalez Acevedo (collectively, Petitioners), are natives and citizens of Mexico.

They petition for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)

affirming a decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) denying their applications for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.