Hardman

Hardman v. Birkholz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202523-3664California1,132 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PARLEY DREW HARDMAN, No. 23-3664 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 2:22-cv-07787-ADS v.

BRYAN BIRKHOLZ, Warden, MEMORANDUM* Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Autumn D. Spaeth, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 4, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN and KOH, Circuit Judges, and BARKER, District Judge.***

Petitioner Parley Hardman appeals from the district court’s final judgment

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition for a writ of habeas

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel previously ordered that this case be submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument. See Dkt. No. 71; Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable J. Campbell Barker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.