Panzak

Panzak v. City of Fowler CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2025F089137California2,859 words

Opinion

Opinion

Desantos, J.

Filed 12/12/25 Panzak v. City of Fowler CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

GORDON PANZAK,

F089137

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 23CECG03031) v.

CITY OF FOWLER et al., OPINION Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Jeffrey Y. Hamilton, Jr., Judge. Gordon Panzak, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Litigation Engineered and Chester E. Walls for Defendants and Respondents. -ooOoo- Plaintiff Gordon Panzak, who has represented himself throughout this case, appeals from an order sustaining the demurrer of defendants City of Fowler (City) and five individual defendants1 (collectively, defendants) to his complaint without leave to amend. Panzak contends the trial judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.