Tesler

Tesler v. United Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202524-5456California732 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHARON TESLER, No. 24-5456 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 4:23-cv-00192-KAW v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Kandis A. Westmore, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BUMATAY, JOHNSTONE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Sharon Tesler appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of United Airlines, Inc. regarding her retaliation cause of action

under California Labor Code § 98.6. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo. In re Oracle Corp.

Sec. Litig., 627…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.