Bondi

Castillo Tinoco v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202525-636California594 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NELSON IPARDO CASTILLO TINOCO; No. 25-636 ILSA IVETH PINEDA PINEDA; Agency Nos.

ANAIVETH CASTILLO PINEDA; A213-153-816

NELSON DAVID CASTILLO-PINEDA,

A213-153-817

A213-153-818

Petitioners, A213-153-819 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BUMATAY, JOHNSTONE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners, a Honduran family, seek review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.