Carlisle

Carlisle v. amazon.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202524-6022California1,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERESA CARLISLE, as an individual and No. 24-6022 on behalf of others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-06856-RFL Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation; AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation; AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Sallie Kim, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BUMATAY, JOHNSTONE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Teresa Carlisle appeals from the district court’s order granting, in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). part, Appellees Amazon.com, Inc.;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.