Arce
Arce v. Honeywell International Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202524-1220California1,432 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LINDA ARCE, No. 24-1220 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-00768-GMS v. MEMORANDUM*
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., a Delaware for-profit corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 24, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona
Before: BERZON and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District Judge.**
Plaintiff-Appellant Linda Arce appeals the district court’s grant of summary
judgment in favor of her former employer, Defendant-Appellee Honeywell
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. International Inc. (“Honeywell”), on Arce’s claim for retaliation under the False
Claims Act (“FCA”),…