Arce

Arce v. Honeywell International Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 12, 202524-1220California1,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINDA ARCE, No. 24-1220 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:21-cv-00768-GMS v. MEMORANDUM*

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., a Delaware for-profit corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 24, 2025 Phoenix, Arizona

Before: BERZON and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and TUNHEIM, District Judge.**

Plaintiff-Appellant Linda Arce appeals the district court’s grant of summary

judgment in favor of her former employer, Defendant-Appellee Honeywell

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. International Inc. (“Honeywell”), on Arce’s claim for retaliation under the False

Claims Act (“FCA”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.