People v. Padilla CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2025E085827California2,065 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/12/25 P. v. Padilla CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E085827

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF089999)

ALBERT ANDREW PADILLA, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Joshlyn R. Pulliam,

Judge. Affirmed.

Albert Andrew Padilla, in pro. per., and Michelle T. LiVecchi-Raufi, under

appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In this postconviction matter under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216

(Delgadillo), defendant and appellant Albert Andrew Padilla appeals from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.