Washington v. Stein CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2025B343990California3,809 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. Facts

A. Plaintiffs sue their landlord and property manager In March 2020, plaintiffs leased a unit in an apartment building located in the Hollywood Heights neighborhood of Los Angeles (the building). In January 2022, plaintiffs sued their then-landlord Wellington Yang (Yang), three of Yang’s limited liability companies, and the building’s then-onsite property manager. The complaint alleged nine causes of action based on allegations that building management had improperly left fire doors open; had not allowed plaintiffs to replace the washing machine in their unit; had closed the building’s pool, gym, and lounge after plaintiffs signed their lease; had withdrawn rent payments from plaintiffs’ account on inconsistent dates; had stopped vacuuming the hallways and providing tenants with air filters; had ignored plaintiffs’ repair requests; had installed surveillance cameras in common areas; and had threatened to tow plaintiffs’ car.

“SLAPP” is short for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated.

2 Plaintiffs later alleged that when…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.