People v. Young CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2025A168131California7,500 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/12/25 P. v. Young CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A168131

v. CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, (Napa County Super. Ct. No. 20CR001796) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Christopher Young appeals a judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder and other crimes. He contends the trial court abused its discretion and deprived him of due process by admitting photographs of the victim while alive, photographs of himself holding a gun, and evidence of an uncharged incident of criminal conduct a week before the murder. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant was convicted of killing 18-year-old Nathan Garza, who was apparently a complete…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.