In re D.R. CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 12, 2025A171253California3,733 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chou, J.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History In March 2023, an amended juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602, subd. (a)) was filed against D.R., alleging that she assaulted M.C. with force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4); counts I & II), assaulted a public transit passenger, L.O., with force likely to produce great bodily injury (id., § 245.2; count III), and battered L.O. (id., § 243.3; count IV). The petition further alleged that D.R. personally inflicted great bodily injury (id., § 12022.7, subd. (a)) with respect to counts III and IV. D.R. admitted to two of the assault counts; one against M.C and one against L.O. She also admitted the allegation that she inflicted great bodily injury on L.O. The juvenile court found a factual basis for the admissions and dismissed the other counts and allegations with a Harvey2 waiver as to victim restitution. The court found the admitted charges to be felonies and declared D.R. a ward of the court. It set the maximum time of confinement to 5 years 8 months and placed D.R. on probation and in a foster home. On June 20, 2023, D.R. stipulated to $9,925 in restitution to victim L.O. for her medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.