Glenn
Thomas Patrick Glenn, IV v. Central Public Defenders
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20253:25-cv-02290California2,292 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS PATRICK GLENN, IV, Case No.: 3:25-cv-2290-BTM-DDL Booking #23748583,
ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION
Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2] AND
(2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
CENTRAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS, FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
16 Defendant. CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b) 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Thomas Patrick Glenn (“Plaintiff” or “Glenn”), a detainee proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. & 2. In his Complaint, Glenn raises claims concerning the representation he received during criminal proceedings. See ECF No. 1 at 2–5. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and dismisses the Complaint. II. IFP MOTION 28…