Orlando Alfredo Gimenez Gil v. Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 9, 20253:25-cv-03279California609 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORLANDO ALFREDO GIMENEZ GIL, Case No.: 3:25-cv-03279-DMS-VET

Petitioner,

ORDER REQUIRING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING WARDEN, OTAY MESA DETENTION CENTER, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 On November 25, 2025, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus 18 (“Petition”). (Pet., ECF No. 1). Respondents filed a return (“Return”). (Return, ECF No. 19 7). Petitioner did not file a reply. 20 Respondents represented in their Return that on July 13, 2024, Petitioner was placed 21 in removal proceedings under 8 U.S.C. § 1229a, issued a Notice to Appear, and released 22 from custody on humanitarian parole. (Return 2). On June 24, 2025, Petitioner’s case was 23 dismissed during an immigration court appearance. (Id.). On the same day, Petitioner was 24 detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, issued a new Notice and Order of 25 Expedited Removal, and placed in expedited removal proceedings under U.S.C. § 26 1225(b)(1). (Id.). Respondents did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.