Hasty

Bradley J. Hasty v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20253:25-cv-02662California404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADLEY J. HASTY, Case No. 25-cv-02662-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. CONSOLIDATE

HYATT CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant.

Plaintiff Bradley Hasty brought this putative class action against Defendant Hyatt Corporation in California state court alleging various state law wage, hour, and labor violations. Hyatt removed the case to federal court. Hasty now seeks to have the instant case consolidated with a case Hasty has filed against it seeking civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), captioned Hasty v. Hyatt Corp., No. 25-cv-04516-RFL. (Dkt. No. 18.) Hasty opposes consolidation. (Dkt. No. 21.) Hyatt’s motion to consolidate is GRANTED. The motion is not moot, as Hasty’s motion to remand in Hasty v. Hyatt Corp., No. 25-cv-04516-RFL has been denied. Common questions of law and fact exist due to the overlap in the factual allegations underlying both cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a); Investors Research Co. v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 877 F.2d 777, 777 (9th Cir. 1989) (district courts have “broad discretion” in ruling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.