Hasty
Bradley J. Hasty v. Hyatt Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRADLEY J. HASTY, Case No. 25-cv-02662-RFL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. CONSOLIDATE
HYATT CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant.
Plaintiff Bradley Hasty brought this putative class action against Defendant Hyatt Corporation in California state court alleging various state law wage, hour, and labor violations. Hyatt removed the case to federal court. Hasty now seeks to have the instant case consolidated with a case Hasty has filed against it seeking civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), captioned Hasty v. Hyatt Corp., No. 25-cv-04516-RFL. (Dkt. No. 18.) Hasty opposes consolidation. (Dkt. No. 21.) Hyatt’s motion to consolidate is GRANTED. The motion is not moot, as Hasty’s motion to remand in Hasty v. Hyatt Corp., No. 25-cv-04516-RFL has been denied. Common questions of law and fact exist due to the overlap in the factual allegations underlying both cases. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a); Investors Research Co. v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 877 F.2d 777, 777 (9th Cir. 1989) (district courts have “broad discretion” in ruling…