Odell

Richard Odell v. Xu/Tzue

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20253:25-cv-04306California1,401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 RICHARD ODELL, Case No. 25-cv-04306-JD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SERVICE

v.

XU/TZUE, Defendant.

11 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court previously found that plaintiff stated a cognizable claim for deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs against defendants Dr. Xu and Dr. Pajong. The remaining defendants were dismissed with leave to amend to present additional allegations. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. Therefore, the case continues against only Dr. Xu and Dr. Pajong. The Court will order service on Dr. Pajong. Dr. Xu was already served and should follow the instruction set forth below. CONCLUSION 1. The Court orders that Dr. Sam Pajong be electronically served at San Quentin Rehabilitation Center. All other defendants are dismissed from this action. Service on the listed defendant will be effected via the CDCR e-service program…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.