Hasty

Bradley J. Hasty v. Hyatt Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20253:25-cv-04516California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADLEY J. HASTY, Case No. 25-cv-04516-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

HYATT CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendant.

Plaintiff Bradley Hasty brought this action against Defendant Hyatt Corporation in state court seeking civil penalties under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Hasty also brought a putative class action against Hyatt, captioned Hasty v. Hyatt Corp., No. 25- cv-02662-RFL (“the Hasty Class Action”), which has been removed to federal court. Hyatt removed this case to federal court on the sole basis that Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”) preempted Hasty’s claims. (Dkt. No. 1 at 4, ¶ 11.) In the Hasty Class Action, Hyatt seeks to have the instant case consolidated. In this case, Hasty now moves to have his case remanded to state court. (Dkt. No. 21.) Because the Court has subject matter jurisdiction under Section 301 and 28 U.S.C. § 1367, Hasty’s motion to remand is DENIED. This case shall be consolidated with Hasty v. Hyatt Corp., No. 25-cv-02662-RFL. This order assumes the reader…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.