Boumakh

Brahim Boumakh v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 8, 20253:25-cv-04882California1,218 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 BRAHIM BOUMAKH, Case No. 25-cv-04882-CRB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

v.

RECOMMENDATION;

DISMISSING CASE

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Plaintiff Brahim Boumakh, proceeding pro se, brought an action on behalf of himself and his companies (Digital-Wireless Telecom, Inc., Nano-TechPower, Inc., and Digital-Trade U.S.A. (Digital UNI)) against Wells Fargo Bank. Compl. (dkt. 1). Boumakh seeks claims for (1) breach of fiduciary duty, (2) negligence and gross negligence, (3) fraud, (4) violation of consumer protection laws, such as the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), and (5) intentional interference with prospective economic advantage. Id. 5–7 (¶¶ 10–14). His allegations stem from Wells Fargo closing his business accounts, which he claims affected major contracts and federally supported grant initiatives. Id. 4 (¶ 6–10). Boumakh alleges he is entitled to $100 million in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.